The BIP324 spec permits for any quantity and any measurement of decoy packets within the preliminary handshake of the protocol, proper after the supplies have been generated and earlier than the model packet is shipped.
Are there robust advantages for this complexity in the course of the handshake? It isn’t clear to me how a lot it provides to have that variability on the “left” facet of the (at the moment empty) model packet. Nevertheless it does add a little bit of complexity to implementations given the dearth of bounds on the decoy packets. I observed Core has not supported sending decoy packets within the handshake since including BIP324 help in v26.0, however is that this a worthy function of the protocol that may later be carried out?
The BIP324 spec permits for any quantity and any measurement of decoy packets within the preliminary handshake of the protocol, proper after the supplies have been generated and earlier than the model packet is shipped.
Are there robust advantages for this complexity in the course of the handshake? It isn’t clear to me how a lot it provides to have that variability on the “left” facet of the (at the moment empty) model packet. Nevertheless it does add a little bit of complexity to implementations given the dearth of bounds on the decoy packets. I observed Core has not supported sending decoy packets within the handshake since including BIP324 help in v26.0, however is that this a worthy function of the protocol that may later be carried out?
