I do know that the channel between two friends might be both introduced or unannounced. Nonetheless, even when the channel is publicly introduced, the steadiness of the channel shouldn’t be revealed. So far as I do know, it is a concern for Lightning Community routing effectivity.
Why cannot a peer decide out of this privateness constraint (with the settlement of the opposite peer) and reveal the steadiness to enhance routing and community effectivity? Revealing the channel’s steadiness reduces privateness, however a well-connected peer may benefit economically by doing so.
As an illustration, a big LN node belonging to an trade could be very more likely to conform to this. They’d achieve extra financial advantages and have little to no privateness issues since they’re already well-known. If they do not care about privateness, this may be a win-win state of affairs.
It’s principally promoting your data to achieve extra money.
I do know that the channel between two friends might be both introduced or unannounced. Nonetheless, even when the channel is publicly introduced, the steadiness of the channel shouldn’t be revealed. So far as I do know, it is a concern for Lightning Community routing effectivity.
Why cannot a peer decide out of this privateness constraint (with the settlement of the opposite peer) and reveal the steadiness to enhance routing and community effectivity? Revealing the channel’s steadiness reduces privateness, however a well-connected peer may benefit economically by doing so.
As an illustration, a big LN node belonging to an trade could be very more likely to conform to this. They’d achieve extra financial advantages and have little to no privateness issues since they’re already well-known. If they do not care about privateness, this may be a win-win state of affairs.
It’s principally promoting your data to achieve extra money.
