On Friday, Maryland Delegate Adrian Boafo (D) and New York Assemblyman Clyde Vanel (D) despatched a joint letter to Democratic Congressional leaders urging them to move complete crypto laws on the federal stage.
Within the letter, the elected officers cited New York State as being a pacesetter in crypto regulation and proposed that New York’s BitLicense be used as a mannequin for what federal crypto regulation ought to appear like. The letter’s authors additionally famous that New York State has positioned a two-year moratorium on proof-of-work cryptocurrency mining that makes use of fossil fuels (seemingly citing this as one thing else the federal authorities would possibly contemplate doing).
It was upon studying these factors within the letter that I spotted that Democrats are able to placing ahead Bitcoin and crypto coverage concepts stupider than what former Vice President Harris proposed in October 2024, which was “a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency and different digital property [that protects] Black males who spend money on and personal these property.”
(Please observe that I’m in favor of a regulatory framework that protects the best of Black males to spend money on crypto property. I’m additionally in favor of 1 that protects the best of Asian males, Hispanic males, White males, and Indigenous males to do the identical. Oh, and I’d like for no matter Bitcoin and crypto coverage we craft right here within the U.S. to guard the best of ladies and transgender folks of all races to spend money on bitcoin and crypto, as effectively.)
With that mentioned, let me break down why the U.S. federal authorities’s creating one thing akin to New York’s BitLicense and placing a mining moratorium on Bitcoin miners that use any quantity of fossil fuels can be a foul thought.
And please forgive me prematurely for being emotional at factors. This problem is private to me, as I’m a resident of New York State and have skilled firsthand the injury that politicians and bureaucrats have finished to the Bitcoin and crypto business within the state.
The BitLicense
New York State requires that every one digital foreign money companies that function within the state receive a BitLicense.
At face worth, acquiring a license to function a enterprise appears innocent sufficient. However when you be taught that it takes months to years to finish all the paperwork and to leap by way of all the hoops required to acquire one and that it prices upward of $100,000 to undergo this course of, you shortly see why so many established firms within the house — by no means thoughts the early-stage start-ups — don’t even begin the method.
Due to the BitLicense, New York State residents can not use respected platforms like Strike, River, Swan, and Kraken. Nor can they use Lightning on CashApp or the fiat-to-bitcoin alternate on Fold. That is solely to call a couple of of the Bitcoin/crypto services and products that we are able to’t use due to pink tape.
However what’s maybe extra of a slap within the face is that while you try to make use of a few of these platforms as a New York State resident, you’re offered with messages reminiscent of “This alternate doesn’t serve residents of jurisdictions together with New York State, Iran, Syria and North Korea.”
TRULY FUCKING STAGGERING THE COMPANY THAT NEW YORK POLITICIANS AND BUREAUCRATS HAVE PUT NEW YORK RESIDENTS IN.
If we had been to use the BitLicense on a federal stage, we’d deeply stifle innovation and entrepreneurship, as not solely would we drastically hinder the Bitcoin and crypto firms which have the cash and sources to undergo the method of acquiring a federal BitLicense, however we’d create a moat round them whereas making a situation through which the start-ups that may’t afford to undergo the method both shut up store or just not serve U.S. residents.
A federal BitLicense can be a significant hindrance to President Trump’s carrying out his purpose of creating america the Bitcoin superpower and the crypto capital of the world. (Perhaps that’s why these Democrats proposed it?)
The Mining Moratorium
Whereas I do know that burning fossil fuels is detrimental to the setting and I imagine that human-made local weather change is an actual factor, I’m additionally a proponent of individuals being gainfully employed and industries with the ability to flourish.
And in upstate New York, there’s been a notable lack of each since factories started closing down within the area after World Battle II.
What’s changed gainful employment in factories in lots of components of upstate New York are service-sector jobs that hardly allow employees to make ends meet.
The city blight in most cities in upstate New York is so palpable that it’s nauseating.
What we might do to revive upstate New York is invite the Bitcoin mining business in. Positive, Bitcoin mining firms would possibly burn some fossil fuels to energy their operations at first, however as Bitcoin mining incentivizes renewable power manufacturing, they may transfer away from fossil fuels as their supply of power.
Additionally, if the likes of Assemblyman Vanel and New York State’s governor, Kathy Hochul (D), are so in opposition to firms that burn fossil fuels then 1) Why haven’t they put a moratorium on all firms within the state that use fossil fuels? and a pair of) Why haven’t they enacted legal guidelines that do issues like stopping all New York residents from utilizing automobiles which have inner combustion engines?
I ask these questions rhetorically, as I do know I’d by no means get solutions from both of them on this, as a result of the mining moratorium is extra for present — advantage signaling, if you’ll — than something.
In the event that they actually wished to make a concerted effort to cease the environmental injury that burning fossil fuels causes in New York, they’d do way more than prohibit Bitcoin mining firms that use fossil fuels from working within the state (and so they’d take down the economic system of New York within the course of).
If we had been to use such a mining moratorium on a federal stage, we’d not solely put many Individuals out of labor, however we’d additionally cede a lot of the hashrate to hostile overseas powers who’re utilizing fossil fuels to mine bitcoin anyway.
My Plea To Democrats
Please cease proposing regulation that may harm an business that would in any other case present many Individuals with high-quality jobs.
Please cease listening to the likes of Delegate Boafo, Assemblyman Vanel, or any of the backward-thinking Democrats to which this letter was addressed, together with Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).
As a substitute, begin taking queues from extra forward-thinking Democrats like Congressman Ro Khanna (D-CA), Congressman Ritchie Torres (D-NY), and former Congressman Wiley Nickel (D-NC), politicians who wish to see Bitcoin and the business that surrounds it achieve america.
On Friday, Maryland Delegate Adrian Boafo (D) and New York Assemblyman Clyde Vanel (D) despatched a joint letter to Democratic Congressional leaders urging them to move complete crypto laws on the federal stage.
Within the letter, the elected officers cited New York State as being a pacesetter in crypto regulation and proposed that New York’s BitLicense be used as a mannequin for what federal crypto regulation ought to appear like. The letter’s authors additionally famous that New York State has positioned a two-year moratorium on proof-of-work cryptocurrency mining that makes use of fossil fuels (seemingly citing this as one thing else the federal authorities would possibly contemplate doing).
It was upon studying these factors within the letter that I spotted that Democrats are able to placing ahead Bitcoin and crypto coverage concepts stupider than what former Vice President Harris proposed in October 2024, which was “a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency and different digital property [that protects] Black males who spend money on and personal these property.”
(Please observe that I’m in favor of a regulatory framework that protects the best of Black males to spend money on crypto property. I’m additionally in favor of 1 that protects the best of Asian males, Hispanic males, White males, and Indigenous males to do the identical. Oh, and I’d like for no matter Bitcoin and crypto coverage we craft right here within the U.S. to guard the best of ladies and transgender folks of all races to spend money on bitcoin and crypto, as effectively.)
With that mentioned, let me break down why the U.S. federal authorities’s creating one thing akin to New York’s BitLicense and placing a mining moratorium on Bitcoin miners that use any quantity of fossil fuels can be a foul thought.
And please forgive me prematurely for being emotional at factors. This problem is private to me, as I’m a resident of New York State and have skilled firsthand the injury that politicians and bureaucrats have finished to the Bitcoin and crypto business within the state.
The BitLicense
New York State requires that every one digital foreign money companies that function within the state receive a BitLicense.
At face worth, acquiring a license to function a enterprise appears innocent sufficient. However when you be taught that it takes months to years to finish all the paperwork and to leap by way of all the hoops required to acquire one and that it prices upward of $100,000 to undergo this course of, you shortly see why so many established firms within the house — by no means thoughts the early-stage start-ups — don’t even begin the method.
Due to the BitLicense, New York State residents can not use respected platforms like Strike, River, Swan, and Kraken. Nor can they use Lightning on CashApp or the fiat-to-bitcoin alternate on Fold. That is solely to call a couple of of the Bitcoin/crypto services and products that we are able to’t use due to pink tape.
However what’s maybe extra of a slap within the face is that while you try to make use of a few of these platforms as a New York State resident, you’re offered with messages reminiscent of “This alternate doesn’t serve residents of jurisdictions together with New York State, Iran, Syria and North Korea.”
TRULY FUCKING STAGGERING THE COMPANY THAT NEW YORK POLITICIANS AND BUREAUCRATS HAVE PUT NEW YORK RESIDENTS IN.
If we had been to use the BitLicense on a federal stage, we’d deeply stifle innovation and entrepreneurship, as not solely would we drastically hinder the Bitcoin and crypto firms which have the cash and sources to undergo the method of acquiring a federal BitLicense, however we’d create a moat round them whereas making a situation through which the start-ups that may’t afford to undergo the method both shut up store or just not serve U.S. residents.
A federal BitLicense can be a significant hindrance to President Trump’s carrying out his purpose of creating america the Bitcoin superpower and the crypto capital of the world. (Perhaps that’s why these Democrats proposed it?)
The Mining Moratorium
Whereas I do know that burning fossil fuels is detrimental to the setting and I imagine that human-made local weather change is an actual factor, I’m additionally a proponent of individuals being gainfully employed and industries with the ability to flourish.
And in upstate New York, there’s been a notable lack of each since factories started closing down within the area after World Battle II.
What’s changed gainful employment in factories in lots of components of upstate New York are service-sector jobs that hardly allow employees to make ends meet.
The city blight in most cities in upstate New York is so palpable that it’s nauseating.
What we might do to revive upstate New York is invite the Bitcoin mining business in. Positive, Bitcoin mining firms would possibly burn some fossil fuels to energy their operations at first, however as Bitcoin mining incentivizes renewable power manufacturing, they may transfer away from fossil fuels as their supply of power.
Additionally, if the likes of Assemblyman Vanel and New York State’s governor, Kathy Hochul (D), are so in opposition to firms that burn fossil fuels then 1) Why haven’t they put a moratorium on all firms within the state that use fossil fuels? and a pair of) Why haven’t they enacted legal guidelines that do issues like stopping all New York residents from utilizing automobiles which have inner combustion engines?
I ask these questions rhetorically, as I do know I’d by no means get solutions from both of them on this, as a result of the mining moratorium is extra for present — advantage signaling, if you’ll — than something.
In the event that they actually wished to make a concerted effort to cease the environmental injury that burning fossil fuels causes in New York, they’d do way more than prohibit Bitcoin mining firms that use fossil fuels from working within the state (and so they’d take down the economic system of New York within the course of).
If we had been to use such a mining moratorium on a federal stage, we’d not solely put many Individuals out of labor, however we’d additionally cede a lot of the hashrate to hostile overseas powers who’re utilizing fossil fuels to mine bitcoin anyway.
My Plea To Democrats
Please cease proposing regulation that may harm an business that would in any other case present many Individuals with high-quality jobs.
Please cease listening to the likes of Delegate Boafo, Assemblyman Vanel, or any of the backward-thinking Democrats to which this letter was addressed, together with Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).
As a substitute, begin taking queues from extra forward-thinking Democrats like Congressman Ro Khanna (D-CA), Congressman Ritchie Torres (D-NY), and former Congressman Wiley Nickel (D-NC), politicians who wish to see Bitcoin and the business that surrounds it achieve america.
