Query:
I’m creating a Neutrino consumer that communicates with BitcoinD. Most P2P messages are working as anticipated, however after I ship a GetData message for a transaction (Tx kind), BitcoinD does not reply with the anticipated transaction information. I’ve verified that the transaction is certainly current on the node. Beneath is the log from BitcoinD:
2024-10-16T11:24:22Z [net] acquired getdata (1 invsz) peer=32
2024-10-16T11:24:22Z [net] acquired getdata for: tx
c1b5b6fb155a8fd41d241abe5efb5aa9de7c8942fdd923ad1e6d94e9deedc3f9 peer=32
Listed below are the small print of my setup:
BitcoinD model: 24
Configuration:
bitcoind
-server=1
-regtest=1
-rpcauth={{rpcUser}}:{{rpcAuth}}
-debug=1
-zmqpubrawblock=tcp://0.0.0.0:28334
-zmqpubrawtx=tcp://0.0.0.0:28335
-zmqpubhashblock=tcp://0.0.0.0:28336
-txindex=1
-dnsseed=0
-upnp=0
-rpcbind=0.0.0.0
-rpcallowip=0.0.0.0/0
-rpcport=18443
-rest
-listen=1
-listenonion=0
-fallbackfee=0.0002
-blockfilterindex=1
-peerblockfilters=1
Has anybody encountered an analogous challenge? Any recommendations on what may very well be going flawed right here or how I’d troubleshoot this additional?
Query:
I’m creating a Neutrino consumer that communicates with BitcoinD. Most P2P messages are working as anticipated, however after I ship a GetData message for a transaction (Tx kind), BitcoinD does not reply with the anticipated transaction information. I’ve verified that the transaction is certainly current on the node. Beneath is the log from BitcoinD:
2024-10-16T11:24:22Z [net] acquired getdata (1 invsz) peer=32
2024-10-16T11:24:22Z [net] acquired getdata for: tx
c1b5b6fb155a8fd41d241abe5efb5aa9de7c8942fdd923ad1e6d94e9deedc3f9 peer=32
Listed below are the small print of my setup:
BitcoinD model: 24
Configuration:
bitcoind
-server=1
-regtest=1
-rpcauth={{rpcUser}}:{{rpcAuth}}
-debug=1
-zmqpubrawblock=tcp://0.0.0.0:28334
-zmqpubrawtx=tcp://0.0.0.0:28335
-zmqpubhashblock=tcp://0.0.0.0:28336
-txindex=1
-dnsseed=0
-upnp=0
-rpcbind=0.0.0.0
-rpcallowip=0.0.0.0/0
-rpcport=18443
-rest
-listen=1
-listenonion=0
-fallbackfee=0.0002
-blockfilterindex=1
-peerblockfilters=1
Has anybody encountered an analogous challenge? Any recommendations on what may very well be going flawed right here or how I’d troubleshoot this additional?
